Talk:Waleed Al-Husseini
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 December 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Waleed Al-Husseini appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Waleed is involved in plagiarizing edit
"Plot Spoiler" has been reverting my following addition, first from the Article and now even from this Talk Page although it has both the copy of Waleed's blog post and the post of Reuters' website. They are identical and Reuters is clearly a trusted source, and therefore the original. His blog used as a source in the article is full of plagiarization, from online sources easily detected if one googles some of its content, this is just one example.
@Plot Spoiler, do you really think Reuters has stolen the article from Waleed's blog?
As there is no third choice
Why are you trying to silence debate about it even here?
I opened a request at the dispute resolution noticeboard about it..
"Waleed has been accused of plagiarizing much of the posts of his blogs, in English and more in Arabic, he claimed authorship of articles written by other writers, e.g. the whole article on Reuters' website entitled "The Higgs particle - what it is and what it does" written by Chris Wickham[14] is exactly copied and claimed to be written by Waleed at his English blog called "Proud Atheist" [15].
[14] http://mobile.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSBRE86306W20120704 OR http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/04/us-science-higgs-explanation-idUSBRE86306W20120704
[15] http://proud-a.blogspot.fr/2012/07/higgs-particle-what-it-is-and-what-it.html
For more information about the problem and the importance of mentioning it in the article, see the discussion on Waleed starting from Reply #7 in the subject "French Council of Ex-Muslims" at http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=23309.0
There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.
The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.
Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:38, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
Translation into Chinese Wikipedia edit
The version 05:09, 9 June 2023 Portwoman of this article is translated into Chinese Wikipedia to expand an existing article.--Wing (talk) 06:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC)