Talk:Walden Galleria

Valet Parking

I disagree with the claim that "Mall officials are also considering adding a valet parking to help shoppers ease a parking crunch. Popular with upscale malls, Walden Galleria would be only the second mall (after Palisades Center) to offer such a service." After the expansion of Eastview Mall in Rochester, NY's suburb of Victor, NY, they added a courtyard and a valet parking service for shoppers. This claim should be revised/investigated further. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Fabykot (talk • contribs) .

I thought I removed that already. Let me check. Powers ^T 15:38, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I just tagged it. [1]. I have no problem if someone wants to remove it. Powers ^T 15:39, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Walden Galleria/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

This article is very short but complemented with 32 footnotes and 5 appropriate images. Well written and referenced, well done.

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

— Wackymacs (talk ~ edits) 09:59, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Featured Article

Is this article worthy of being a featured article, it's very well written and one of the largest malls in new york 74.78.160.253 (talk) 01:17, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

• I don't think it's quite ready for FA status yet. It would probably need a couple interior shots (my friend Jack only had exterior shots), and I would also think that it would be best to wait until the outdoor concourse is finished so that the article is more "final". Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:24, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Closures

Closures should be removed as they become increasingly more irrelevant quickly what do you think?Incredible93 (talk) 22:29, 13 January 2022 (UTC)

Bias concern

To be frank, this article reads as though it was put together by the PR department for the mall. "As the new millennium arrived, so did several exciting developments," and the like. It simply does not read as an objective description of the topic. 128.206.208.6 (talk) 16:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)