Talk:Waipoua Forest

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Gadfium in topic Hatnote

Untitled

edit

I have a number of resources to contribute here: - A video of the forest, including specific coverage of Waipoua Forest. - A geocache right there (w/ lots of useful information), as well as at two other nearby locations of relevance. I therefore propose the following inclusions under external links:

Under ==See also==

Faber Optimé (talk) 08:28, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oppose. As has been explained to you by several people at User talk:Faber Optimé, you should not be linking to your own work, and all those who have reviewed your videos to date appear to have agreed that they are not suitable as links. Geocaching links are also not suitable-gadfium 20:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

I was going to move the Warawara forest reference in the Waipoua Forest page to a new Warawara forest page - they are completely separate forests LawrieM (talk) 21:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re-write needed

edit

Can someone please edit this article. It is full of non sequiturs, poor grammar and rather childish commentary.122.59.209.73 (talk) 10:19, 20 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Waipoua Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:42, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Waipoua Forest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hatnote

edit

This topic is to discuss the creation of a disambiguation page or the addition of a hatnote to direct users looking for the article for the spider genus of the same name. I'd like to keep the hatnote in for now, because it's much easier to erase the hatnote from one article than to have an entire disambig page deleted (unless you happen to be a user with that power).

The page Waipoua currently redirects to Waipoua Forest, but there is an article about the spider genus of the same name on the page Waipoua (spider) and no way to direct users to that page (or any indication that the page even exists). There will inevitably be people looking for the article about the spider found in this forest, so the question is whether to create a disambiguation page at "Waipoua" or a hatnote on this page.

"Waipoua Forest" is the primary topic here, but I don't think creating a disambiguation page is necessary. See WP:Hatnotes are cheap. In fact, I think far more users will be looking for the article on the forest rather than the spider, so using a disambig page will make these people go through an additional step to find it. Adding a hatnote is my vote because I feel that it's the least disruptive way to direct the few people looking for the spider page, but I'm not an expert on the rules by any means. Sesamehoneytart 14:52, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I suggest simply changing the page Waipoua from a redirect page to a disambiguation page - linking to both Waipoua Forest and Waipoua (spider). Ross Finlayson (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I suppose I don't understand why the hatnote is a problem in the first place. If it seems invasive, I can move the spider to its name and add a hatnote there directing users to the forest page, but it depends on how many people will type in "Waipoua" looking for "Waipoua Forest"? Sesamehoneytart 15:08, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
The issue is that nobody is likely to type in "Waipoua Forest" if they are looking for a spider. Therefore, a hatnote pointing to Waipoua (spider) doesn't make much sense on the Waipoua Forest page. However, it's possible that someone might type in "Waipoua" if they are looking for a spider - or for the forest. That's why I suggest replacing the contents of the Waipoua page - removing the redirect tag, and simply replacing the contents with a disambiguation list (to both Waipoua Forest and Waipoua (spider). Ross Finlayson (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have modified the hatnote to address the redirect specifically. If this is not satisfactory, I have no problem if my change is reverted.-gadfium 21:32, 10 April 2019 (UTC)Reply