Talk:Waipahu High School

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Apparition11 in topic Valedictorians

Fair use rationale for Image:Waipahu High School logo.jpg edit

 

Image:Waipahu High School logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:41, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Constributions? I deleted the "constributions" portion. It provides no notable information.

Valedictorians edit

An IP has inserted the 2008 & 2009 valedictorians a couple of times. According to WP:WPSCH/AG#S, individual students shouldn't be listed unless they are notable in their own right. Being valedictorian obviously doesn't satisfy this. I just wanted to see if anyone agreed or disagreed with my reversion of this. Thanks. Apparition11 Complaints/Mistakes 22:26, 24 June 2009 (UTC)Reply