Talk:Wael Zuaiter

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Joshdboz in topic redirect

Calling a suspected terrorist a "spokesman for the Palestianian cause" doesn't sound too NPOV to me. But again, I don't know much about him, so I can't say. -- Where is Where? 14:47, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ugg, all of the pages online about him are hopelessly biased. But there are so few pages, that he really doesn't seem that notable to me. -- Where is Where? 14:50, 17 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Just because Mossad suspects somebody for being a terrorist doesn't mean they necessarily are. That's why other countries in the civilized world use courts to decide if somebody is guilty or not, not state-terrorism.Mackan 03:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
Maybe something like "..spokesman for the Palestianian cause...who was accused by the Israeli government of terrorism..." If he was never successfully tried (I assume he wasn't) it would be wrong to label him as a terrorist, but it is important to note the accusations levelled at him. If is linked (or accused of being linked) to the '72 Olympics then he should be included, but I would guess that it'll be hard to find sufficent unbiased (by either side) info to make a decent article. Dancarney 22:07, 21 June 2006 (UTC)Reply
How can you, without knowing anything about him, claim that the article is biased? You are simply assuming that he would be a terrorist because Mossad said so, THAT'S biased if anything. I can see nothing in the article being NPOV, if there were any facts or known circumstances purposedly not mentioned that'd be different, but since nobody seems able to find anything to put in, I am removing the "neutrality" tag. Mackan 17:14, 26 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

redirect edit

I have blanked this article and redirected it to the more complete version Abdel Wael Zwaiter. There are many variations on his name so that article may eventually be moved too. Joshdboz 16:06, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply