Talk:WPP plc
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
About firestar edit
Is there any subsidiary company of wpp plc named firestar? 2409:4055:416:CA8D:0:0:1AD5:E0B1 (talk) 04:57, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
WPP in Kenya edit
Has the company liased with the Kenyan government to have it branch in Kenya? 41.89.224.180 (talk) 13:49, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
Draft:GroupM edit
On behalf of GroupM, I've submitted a draft article about the company at Draft:GroupM. I welcome draft improvements and additional feedback on the draft's Talk page.
Thanks! Inkian Jason (talk) 19:38, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Violations of the law in Vietnam edit
Several IPs keep adding excessive detail (without a source in English) about breaches of the law in Vietnam. The IPs want to list details of the violations in detail. I am not clear of the nature of these heinousness crimes (the legislation is designed to combat attacks on the communist party) but they may have just been instances of advertising on YouTube and Facebook, in which case they look to me like the actions of an oppressive regime. Dormskirk (talk) 07:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC)