Talk:W76

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Geni in topic Holbrook

About This Stub edit

I know this is a stub but it is out of date. It has been determined that the pit at the core of the W76 will last nearly 100 years, so they don't have to be replaced any time soon and the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program is on the rocks as it is, so that is unlikely to be the replacement for it anytime soon anyway. 65.120.76.32 (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

New Article: How the US forgot how to make Trident missiles edit

You folks might want to check this out:

--Radical Mallard 3/12/09 7 PM EST

File:W76 warheads.jpg Nominated for Deletion edit

  An image used in this article, File:W76 warheads.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Holbrook edit

Its's been suggested that the UK's Holbrook is a clone of this design. reliable sources on this are a problem mind.©Geni (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

It should probably get a separate page.Kylesenior (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Holbrookm is mentioned in the trident page but should probably be mentioned here if we can find a solid source.©Geni (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Sandia says britian using a W76 clone https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/labs-accomplishments/article/2011/nuclear-weapons-engineering-3/ military balance says Holbrook is the name https://www.iiss.org/blogs/military-balance/2021/03/uk-nuclear-warheads-integrated-review
©Geni (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)Reply