Talk:W. D. Hamilton

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Opening sentence

edit

The opening sentence sounds like Richard Dawkins' opinion is important in assessing someone's contribution to evolutionary biology, but Hamilton's scientific achievements dwarf those of Dawkins (and I am no Dawkins basher). Rewrite? 129.215.91.27 (talk) 14:46, 8 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

An un-refed and not v g summary

edit

I've deleted "Although the theory can be proven mathematically, to date no empirical studies have calculated values for R, B, and C to determine if Hamilton's rule is ever satisfied in nature. After more than 40 years, some scientists claim that the theory remains unconfirmed, although predictions based upon it are largely supported. Because B and C represent gains and losses, it is impossible to compare actual gains and losses with the possible ones that would result from an alternate history. Statisticians, however, argue that such comparisons can be made between similar families in which different versions of history play out." because it's un-refed and not a very good summary. "can be proven mathematically" is far too strong, indeed Nowak, Tarnita and Wilson basically dis-proved it mathematically. But it can certainly be shown to work mathematically under a range of suitable conditions. But then "no empirical studies have calculated values for R, B, and C to determine if Hamilton's rule is ever satisfied in nature" is also far too strong. There are some quite good papers that go a long way towards this, but at NTW notes its a very complex area and almost impossible to get good enough definitions of r B C to be sure. So best left out altogether for now I think. NBeale (talk) 13:05, 25 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Need a separate section for Personal Life

edit

This article could use a separate section for Hamilton's personal life. Currently, such information is scattered about in various places in the article. Memills (talk) 05:40, 15 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on W. D. Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on W. D. Hamilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply