Talk:Vučedol culture

The skeptic

sheer speculation! Gow 14:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

This is still true. The author seems not to be able to distinguish between facts and opinions! HJJHolm (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Clean-up

Well, we don't know, do we? This thing needs a "strong and powerful" clean-up at which time its truth can be evaluated and corrected. The part about Troy and the Italics - if someone credible holds those theories we are sort of obliged now to put them in. The editor started the article and it isn't fair to blame him for his English but if he has something to say it needs to be in. I'm not sure he is able to do his own English refs so maybe someone should help him along. One for all and all for one.Dave (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Vučedol culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090506012028/http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/enovcan.htm?tsfsg=5caabbb4dca58151e125c650d3cdae36 to http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/enovcan.htm?tsfsg=5caabbb4dca58151e125c650d3cdae36
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604014056/http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/novcanice/e20k.htm?tsfsg=72c2ffab4bf1c37eca77ca1333e8e02b to http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/novcanice/e20k.htm?tsfsg=72c2ffab4bf1c37eca77ca1333e8e02b
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110604014104/http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/novcanice/e20k-2izdanje.htm?tsfsg=911dce4dc2c1cd7de4e1a5b41fd53785 to http://www.hnb.hr/novcan/novcanice/e20k-2izdanje.htm?tsfsg=911dce4dc2c1cd7de4e1a5b41fd53785

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

"Kostolac culture" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kostolac culture. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Oldest calendar

I'd like to see a year cited. Reference 10 is a “no find”.

[1] says 2600 BC, but it's a blog.

I suppose (as per talk above) there's not much to back it up.

MBG02 (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

MBG02 thanks for the note, please feel free to use WP:CLEANUPTAG to mark these kinds of issues more clearly in the future. I previously came across the same issue and had found a half-decent reference, so I updated the text a bit. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)