Talk:Vostok 6

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 2001:4BC9:A45:2B8E:84:F38C:F228:2B48 in topic Contradictory orbital parameter statements

Anti-femine

edit

This article may be overly sourced from sources with 1960's origin. It's wording and topic choices seem rather hostile towards women in space fleet. I am going to look at improving this article more. Anyone else have any thoughts? fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) 00:11, 13 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Issue addressed, more citations needed though. fcsuper (How's That?, That's How!) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) 20:51, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Error

edit

Please add some detail to the error that occured in control program. This section makes no sense in English.

Cite 2 - Civilian in Space

edit

At the time of her space travel Tereshkova was lieutenant or junior lieutenant of the Soviet Air Force. When the 5 women entered the training program, it is true, that they were civilians and had no military track (opposite to most or all of the male candidates), but as soon as they entered the training, they became junior lieutenants. http://www.astronautix.com/astros/terhkova.htm "First Civilian in Space" is part of the (Post-)Soviet folklore. To be part of the military was important to them, also in regards of their pensions and other privileges. It would be great if somebody else could verify and then change the article. Kamanins diaries might be a good place for verification. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.24.214.105 (talk) 17:47, 14 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Monument

edit

The Google Maps link to the monument shows a clear picture. I like the monument, but it doesn't look very Soviet. Is there any info on when it was installed, or who sculpted it? BPMullins | Talk 00:24, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vostok 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vostok 6. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Contradictory orbital parameter statements

edit

The apo- and perigee values in the infobox don't match the values in the "mission parameters" section. Which values are true, the ones in the infobox or those in the section? Or does it depend on each orbit? 2001:4BC9:A45:2B8E:84:F38C:F228:2B48 (talk) 13:03, 9 December 2022 (UTC)Reply