Talk:Vorbis comment
Latest comment: 6 years ago by Creak in topic TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 |
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
AudioGrail edit
82.240.189.110, is there something notable about AudioGrail? It looks to be Yet Another Tag Editor. Unless it does something unique and specific to Ogg Vorbis comments, we either need a much larger list in a separate article, or we should remove it entirely. piman 19:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Change of article title edit
Should the title of this article not be VorbisComment rather than Vorbis comment? The former is used on the Xiph.Org wiki, as seen here. 151.226.52.75 (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard edit
TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard, as seen in ABCDE source code:
# TRACKTOTAL is not in the proposed, minimal list of standard field names from # xiph.org: https://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html but is in common usage # and read by mediainfo, ffprobe, vlc, Aqualung, ogg123, Foobar. And now abcde :) # The tag is quietly ignored by Audacious, MPlayer, mpv, XMMS....
That's why I added it in the de facto list in the article (but it got reverted).