Talk:Vladimir Pokrovskii
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Qflib in topic Research section is too ambiguous
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Research section is too ambiguous edit
The research section does not clearly explain what the subject's CONTRIBUTIONS to the areas described are. Rather, these are broad descriptions of the areas that the subject has WORKED IN - at least, that's how the text reads at present. The language of this section needs to be much more focused on what this person's specific contributions and achievements were - this is not a CV, resume, or review article.
Currently I don't see a simple way to fix this other than to strip out most of the text, so I thought I would try to get a conversation going here and hope that someone will instead do some significant and productive editing. Qflib, aka KeeYou Flib (talk) 14:47, 13 February 2023 (UTC)