Talk:Vishuddha Siddhanta Panjika
Latest comment: 18 years ago by Swami Vimokshananda in topic Needs cleanup
ρ
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vishuddha Siddhanta Panjika article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
new link
editthe free mobile bengali panjika / bangabda calculation program link may be included in external link section http://www.myjavaserver.com/~sourav/tithi/Tithi.htm it may increase public awareness
Needs cleanup
editNeeds cleanup for more neutral presentation JQ 05:45, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
- I would be thankful and am ready to re-write if you please point out the non-neutral points here. VMO 02:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to help on this. As an example, the article has "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides valuable articles on astrology and useful information on astronomy;". It would be better put as "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides articles on astrology and information on astronomy;". Remove words and points of argument that praise the almanac, and stick to describing what it is. Quote (with citations if possible) people who endorse the almanac, but don't describe them as famous, eminent and so on.JQ 04:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please see the changes. Can the cleanup tag be removed? VMO 06:31, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
- Glad to help on this. As an example, the article has "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides valuable articles on astrology and useful information on astronomy;". It would be better put as "Vishuddha siddhanta panjika provides articles on astrology and information on astronomy;". Remove words and points of argument that praise the almanac, and stick to describing what it is. Quote (with citations if possible) people who endorse the almanac, but don't describe them as famous, eminent and so on.JQ 04:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)