Talk:Vishal–Shekhar

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

POV

edit

Slowly rising to the top?

Isn't that a judgement that Wikipedia shouldn't be making? I'm going to remove that bit of POV, and I'm going to hope the rest of it isn't that bad. Too tired to do any more. --Phant 08:28, 3 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:24, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Poopy?

edit

Poopy? I have removed that edit. It was done by 68.197.99.151 --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 09:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

VJ

edit

I have removed the part which says vishal was a VJ.In a recent interview he told that he was never a VJ.Prav001 (talk) 20:03, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[1].Reply

Time to split??

edit

I think it is time that they both should have separate pages along with this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sandy13991 (talkcontribs) 17:59, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

edit
  1. ^ "I was never a VJ".
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Vishal–Shekhar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:24, 16 January 2016 (UTC)Reply