Talk:Vinča-Belo Brdo

Serbia Top‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cultural Heritage of Serbia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cultural Heritage of Serbia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Cultural Heritage of SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject Cultural Heritage of SerbiaCultural Heritage of Serbia articles

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Created edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Created using material taken from the article Vinca. See there for Version history and authors. Gow 13:56, 17 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

merge edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

The following discussion is archived. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

Not merged
—

V = I * R

(talk) 06:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

One is about one place that happens to be the eponymous site, the other about the Vinca culture. I see no reason for a merger. Gow 13:20, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

I too don't see why would they be merged. If anything, they should be split further apart. Nikola (talk) 00:35, 29 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Agree per given reasons. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:21, 3 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

Images edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Serbian version of this article has some good pictures that appear to be appropriately licensed. I can't navigate the Wikimedia Commons labyrinth myself, but they would be a good addition. —Joseph Roe^Tk•Cb, 16:32, 9 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Excavations of archaeological site in Vinča, c. 1920.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:24, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic