 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
References edit
Hi all, the article does not contain any references, it contains a link to the book itself and two unpublished, unreliable sources in the external links that do not count as references. Please do not remove any banners without discussing or correcting the problems first. Thanks! Footlessmouse (talk) 02:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please note, if no one else does so first, I will come back around and add references to the article. I am primarily building a giant to-do list of science book articles which currently do not match Wikipedia standards. I enjoy improving book pages, as they are fairly straight-forward to work on. Footlessmouse (talk) 02:05, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
I could only find two published sources to use as references, and one of them (The The American Biology Teacher review) seems trivial to me, which is why I first put up the banner. I removed the banner because its triviality is debatable. I seem to remember tagging quite a few Asimov articles. If sources for these cannot be found, I will add banners as necessary. It seems to me that we need to have a Bibliography of Isaac Asimov as a catch all to handle some of these less notable books. Footlessmouse (talk) 04:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)