Talk:Vietnam: The Australian War
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is currently the subject of an educational assignment. |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Vietnam: The Australian War. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://paperchainbookstore.com.au/PaperchainBookstore/events.cfm?events_id=98&view=detail
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:49, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello Wikiusers!
I've added a significant amount to the stub that goes a little more in depth into the book's contents, facts and how it's been received. I'm a newbie to this all so please forgive me if there are any serious mistakes (I'd be very grateful if someone pointed them out to me!). I realised that I should've refined the details in my own sandbox a little too late, but since I've already published the changes on the stub, I'll continue as soon as possible to refine the citations as I think there are one or two (maybe three?) examples from the lead, Recognition and Adaptions sections that need to be sorted out.
Warm regardsUmbri8291 (talk) 14:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Umbri8291
Hiya Wikiusers!
I've made some further changes by adding more detailed descriptions to the contents of the book, adding into the infobox, and including a 'See Also' section. I think everything seems in order, but considering that I'm new to this, a mistake (or two) could pop up. Thanks everyone for checking out the added work!
Umbri8291 (talk) 13:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)Umbri8291