Talk:Victorian Greens

discussion of the article

This article says that the Victorian Greens "they are often represented by a lead candidate, who is preselected by the party as the need arises".

While undoubtedly they have eight upper house candidates who are in a lead role, it is not true that all eight of these candidates are in a stronger position than the strongest of the lower house candidates. And while they have one lead upper house candidate for the Senate, I would consider the position of "Leader of the Victorian Greens" to be related to state elections.

So since they haven't preselected a lead candidate for the coming state election, I'm gonna delete this. Ben Raue (Talk) 10:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

I was thinking we should change the name of this article to "Australian Greens Victoria", since that's actually the name of the party. Any thoughts? Ben Raue (Talk) 23:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

That is indeed the correct name of for the article. I'll move it now. — coelacan talk — 06:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Fed primary vote?

May I suggest changing the table results from the lower to the upper house. The upper is where their vote counts and is what it used on Australian Greens. They received over 10% in Victoria in the 2007 election. Timeshift (talk) 10:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Requested move 18 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Unopposed proposal; moving the page under WP:RMNOMIN. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 13:51, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

---

Australian Greens Victoria → Victorian Greens – Per the recent moves of state party branches to names that align with WP:COMMONNAME Loytra (talk) 23:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)— Relisting. >>> Extorc.talk 08:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.