| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Victoria Harbour article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Comment requested edit
User:Huaiwei has insisted not to have the leading paragraphs written in a summary-style, and insisted that some materials are duplicated [1]. (See also the edit summaries [2].) — Instantnood 08:22, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Tourism section? edit
What is with that section?? No tourist actually enters the harbour! I mean the section should be removed, no one actually says that they want to visit the Harbour, and the section does nothing but tell you that it's famous around the world for it's stunning paranormic views of Hong Kong (which it's not). And all the public events aren't actually held in the harbour, but next to it. Jackp 12:08, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Grammar edit
There are many instances of poor grammar and awkward phrasing. A native English speaker should review this article.