Talk:Vicky Brago-Mitchell
Latest comment: 17 years ago by Btball in topic Terrible article
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2006-10-28. The result of the discussion was Delete. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on March 10, 2007. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Good research! I agree, I'm not Notable. The publishing company was 祥文社--it no longer exists--and my surname at the time was 関根.
76.168.76.11 05:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)Vicky Brago-Mitchell
Terrible article
editI'd normally tag db-bio, but after a rewrite it survived the second AfD as no consensus.... There are no references, so technically, every line of the article could be deleted ... however a Google search does support much of the article, so I've simply added fact tags. It this article is going to survive is should be totally re-written to highlight the notability and get rid of all the irrelevant bio information such as number of marriages ... that's not important Brian 13:13, 13 June 2007 (UTC)btball