Talk:Vicars' Close, Wells

Vicars' Close, Wells has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 10, 2015. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Vicars' Close, Wells appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2009, and was viewed approximately 3,608 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Vicars' Close, Wells (pictured) was called "that rarest of survivals, a planned street of the mid-14th century" by John Julius Norwich?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/March.

Wikipedia

Highways: United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force.

Somerset Low‑importance

	Somerset portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Somerset, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Somerset on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SomersetWikipedia:WikiProject SomersetTemplate:WikiProject SomersetSomerset articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orientation

Latest comment: 15 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

V interesting page, well done. You talk about it looking longer/shorter depending on whether it is veiwed from the top/bottom, but the photo is captioned 'looking south' Is this looking from the top to the bottom, or from the bottom to the top? 86.147.160.236 (talk) 11:29, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I used 'nearest the cathedral' in place of 'bottom'. --Derek Andrews (talk) 22:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi - another question - did your use of 'top' and 'bottom' suggest that the ground is sloping? I can't really tell from the photo. 86.147.160.236 (talk) 08:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

That actually came from what I copied over from Wells to start the article. But yes, it rises away from the cathedral. My recollection was that it is not much, but the OS map shows a 5m rise. --Derek Andrews (talk) 10:25, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

This photo [1] in commons shows the roofs stepping up, something I hadn't noticed before. --Derek Andrews (talk) 10:29, 16 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Update

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Rodw - I think a short update would benefit this article. A proposed restoration is generating some interest in the architectural press, and it has highlighted potential contributions by William Burges, which I think is a relatively recent discovery. I shall see what Crook has to say, and drop a paragraph in, unless anyone else wants to pick it up. KJP1 (talk) 13:15, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic