Talk:Vic Rawl

Authorship

I am the author of the Facebook group text that has been modified for use here. I would ask that this page not be deleted again. I work on Vic's campaign and am full authorized to use this text. Harlanh001 (talk) 16:57, 1 June 2010 (UTC)harlanh001

Sounds like a WP:Conflict of interest to me. Wikipedia isn't meant to be a billboard for others' advertising, commercial, professional or cause-driven. This policy clashes with the practical difficulty that those with the most knowledge and interest in putting out information about relatively-unknown things and people often have strong reasons to support or oppose the subject. But that's why there's a policy, worked out through years of passionate discussion. On the other hand, most of the article's text is pretty factual, although a hypothetical opponent on the Charleston City Council might write the last section differently. —— Shakescene (talk) 19:06, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Harlan001 Why don't you mention the results of the election or the challenge to the results? Paragoalie (talk) 21:01, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File:VicRawl.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:VicRawl.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations What should I do? Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:VicRawl.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 03:14, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vic Rawl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100619103408/http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com:80/_news/2010/06/16/4517878-sc-dems-to-hold-hearing-on-greene-tomorrow to http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/06/16/4517878-sc-dems-to-hold-hearing-on-greene-tomorrow

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)