Talk:Viagogo/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Fair use rationale for Image:Global pic logo.gif
Image:Global pic logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:46, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
logo
the viagogo-logo has changed, so why not change it here too? see one of the viagogo-web sites for the new logo— Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.183.76.244 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Advert
Spam? Honestly just seems like one massive advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.29.66 (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Removed the massive link collection and rewrote the lead paragraph, but the page is still not encyclopedic. Thomas Nygreen (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
The page has come too far the other way. It has turned into a soapbox for people with an axe to grind with viagogo — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.140.206 (talk • contribs)
Criticism
German-language report about buyers in Germany purchasing tickets via Viagogo that turned out to be invalid. Attempts to contact Viagogo about problems resulted in a paper chase to find someone responsible. It ended in London, where they were told that no questions would be answered. Link--217.187.37.7 (talk) 13:58, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- On 18th March 2016 viagogo were selling 11 tickets to Radiohead concerts in the UK (Face value £65) for a total of £15,389.95. This "fact" was posted on their wikipedia page (with reference to their own website) and has been removed twice. Perhaps the page should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.146.91.78 (talk) 07:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
- This article is an excellent example of how WP can be manipulated for PR purposes. This company has a dreadful reputation and regularly attracts criticism. There isn't the slightest mention of any of this. --Ef80 (talk) 11:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Untitled
"Bundesliga": Some different view... It was not just "dismissed": Today viaNogo got a kick in its bloody ass by Schalke 04, mostly because of the many fans who did not accept this kind of selling tickets. Of course, officially the Schalke management spoke about duties of the contract vianogo did not fullfill ("Verträge sind dazu da, um eingehalten zu werden – das gilt immer für beide Vertragspartner. Viagogo hat durch sein Verhalten gezeigt, dass ihnen dazu der Wille fehlt." Clemens Tönnies.) But in GE it is well-known why: http://schalker-block5.de/index.php?page=Thread&threadID=34013&pageNo=1 Btw, at the moment you still can purchase "cheap" tickets at the vng-site for the Derby: http://www.viagogo.de/Sport-Tickets/Fussball/1-Bundesliga/FC-Schalke-04-Karten/E-551733 Unfortunatly not yet available at the Schalke-site. :-)— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.108.212.150 (talk • contribs) 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
In addition: http://www.tagesspiegel.de/sport/ticketanbieter-viagogo-schalke-fans-als-vorreiter-gegen-preisspirale/8477486.html or http://www.jp4sport.biz/archive/6040/mein-deal-mit-viagogo/ almost a crime story of a supporter of Borussia Dortmund.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.108.212.150 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Viagogo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20130513032225/http://www.bilbaobbklive.com:80/2013/en/ to http://www.bilbaobbklive.com/2013/en/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Viagogo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111222013700/http://www.indexventures.com/news/index/news_id/46 to http://www.indexventures.com/news/index/news_id/46
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://today.reuters.com/misc/PrinterFriendlyPopup.aspx?type=companyNews&storyID=42893+18-Aug-2006+RTRS - Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.itn.co.uk/news/sport_cf8459c0884a1ebbdb92621d98f9e1ae.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131010001159/http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-328259/ to http://stream.wsj.com/story/latest-headlines/SS-2-63399/SS-2-328259/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 23 December 2017 (UTC)