Talk:Vermont South, Victoria

Is the public transport timetable information adding value to the article? It takes a lot of space, and might be better replaced with a link to the Metlink website. A comment on its high frequency might be enough extra information for the article. Cheltenham3192 11:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

My thoughts exactly, but I'll leave it to Melburnians to decide. Orderinchaos78 13:57, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vermont South, Victoria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20070830014754/http://www.wev.vic.gov.au/Page/Page.asp?Page_Id=154&h=0 to http://www.wev.vic.gov.au/Page/page.asp?Page_Id=154&h=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:41, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Commercial Area

Recently I cleaned up the business where it appears that a so-called "well known" business. Let this be known that "ProTechnologies" are not a well known business nor are there are evidence that points that this business are bringing customers to the area. Lastly, this entry was included by an IP address, a person without an account as well as an account name "Protechnologies" which could possibly be self promotion. Throttler (talk) 03:35, 23 January 2021 (UTC)