Talk:Vermont Route 14/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

---

Good work, just some techicalities and we're done!

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC) b (MoS): - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

• Metric conversions are needed in both route description sections.
• Second Branch White River? - This make sense, but perhaps adding "of the" makes it more of an accurate read. (Based on my assumption)

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Excellent sources. If it is possible, maybe secondary sources for the description, but the map will carry.

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: - Updated:  — master son^{T - C} 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

   Putting on hold pending prose review and conversion corrections

   Thanks for the quick turn-around on the review. Regarding the wording of the river, "Second Branch White River" is how it is listed on topographic maps. However, when I checked how various published texts treat this, I found more instances where it is written as "Second Branch of the White River". I have made the change as you suggested since it does read better this way. I have also added kilometer conversions for mile figures in the prose. I have also added USGS topographic maps as a reference for the route description as some of the geographic features described are not obvious on Google Maps. Let me know if you find anything else after you re-review. Thanks again. --Polaron | Talk 04:01, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

   All "good" now - congrats.  — master son^{T - C} 04:17, 6 February 2009 (UTC)