Talk:Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014)

A fact from Verizon Communications Inc. v. FCC (2014) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Verizon v. FCC (2014) was reported to be the death of network neutrality, having vacated two of the FCC Open Internet Order 2010's three regulations?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/March.

Wikipedia

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Needs further updating for Common Carrier status edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I'm not an expert, so I'm not going to make the changes, but I think it's pretty clear that the significance and meaning of this case has changed since this article was written. In 2015, the year after this decision, the FCC cited this case and the continuing need for Net Neutrality as the reason to class ISPs as "common carriers". This gave the FCC extremely broad jurisdiction and was widely seen as a huge win for Net Neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.58.8 (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2014 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

"Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The redirect Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic