Talk:VenueGen

This looks fine and fact driven to me, particularly when you compare it to the sties on second life etc.I will try it out.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on VenueGen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110707195216/http://avtechnologyonline.com/article/38260.aspx to http://avtechnologyonline.com/article/38260.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100414093825/http://www.workplace-mag.com:80/VenueGen-offers-a-virtual-and-fun-meeting-place.html to http://www.workplace-mag.com/VenueGen-offers-a-virtual-and-fun-meeting-place.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110717114827/http://tvnprod.com/System_Req.pdf to http://tvnprod.com/System_Req.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:15, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposal for deletion

I see a proposal for deletion of this page failed 9 years ago in 2015. The company now no longer appears to be operating and its website domain is available to purchase. Would this fact, along with the issue tags on the page, support opening a new deletion proposal? Whisky and more (talk) 10:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

In a word: no. Notability is not temporary, and the subject's disputed notability was argued at AfD through the availability of third-party sources. A topic does not cease to be notable for inclusion in Wikipedia when it ceases to exist. A renewed deletion proposal should have a more convincing policy-based rationale that sufficient non-trivial WP:RS coverage cannot be found to show notability instead. • Gene93k (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks @Gene93k. Appreciate the quick response and context to proposals for deletions. Happy wiki-ing! Whisky and more (talk) 11:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)