Talk:Vehicle registration plates of Georgia (U.S. state)


Request for comment edit

Should each section of this article receive its own (sub-)article, or should the information be presented in this article itself? Qqqqqq (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • Given the article as it stands now is a bloody mess that looks as if it was written by for and of numberplate anoraks, it could stand a bit of a thinning. I would be for splitting it and other such articles into sub pages, since most people would want to know about the basic number plate and do not need to be burdened with dozens of types on offer. Plus, looking at the edit history of the article, you seem to have claimed ownership to it. This revision [1] seems to be a great improvement and you seem to be clinging to your clunky complicated anorak version of the article. --Bolly Nickers (talk) 20:11, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
It's exactly those kinds of uncivil and personal attacks that motivated me to resist wholesale changes to the page, as well as their not being discussed beforehand. Changes should be made for constructive, rather than ideological, reasons. I'm not, and I wasn't, opposed to changes to a page that I had worked to build, but, rather, that the changes were initially made by a user that exhibited open hostility toward me, as well as various sockpuppets that have since been banned. Qqqqqq (talk) 21:35, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
But the changes do seem to be constructive, the edit I have mentioned does seem to make the article seem less like a bloody list for anoraks. Do we really need to get into specifics such as high numbers and the like? It does seem a bit as if that you, especially in light of the inclusion of photos you have taken, as if you are attempting to turn it into your Georgia number plates page. If you want to do that, there are several free web hosting sites you can use. Your reaction seems as if you need to walk away and take a brief break as you are taking things to seriously. The article does need to read less like it is for number plate anoraks and for general readers. --Bolly Nickers (talk) 23:16, 19 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why is this RFC in history and geography? Not a good tag choice. Brando130 (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  • I would have to agree that this article was a mess, the split fork article is also a bit of a mess. It would probably be better if it was just mentioned that the state offers the plates and link to the DMV's website that seems to show everything the state issues and get rid of the fork article.. Please see WP:NOT. I'd also do it for the other states as well. --17:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)Kitsap Beach (talk)

Missed one edit

This current Georgia tag should be added to the list: [2]. Gulbenk (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:07, 6 May 2022 (UTC)Reply