Talk:Vasil Levski/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I'll be reviewing your article. Thanks, Kensplanet^Talk_{Contributions}

Check out the Good article criteria here:

(1). Well written:
1 (a). the prose is clear and the spelling and grammar are correct; and
1 (b). it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, jargon, words to avoid, fiction, and list incorporation.

(2). Factually accurate and verifiable:
2 (a). it provides references to all sources of information, and at minimum contains a section dedicated to the attribution of those sources in accordance with the guide to layout;
2 (b). at minimum, it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons; and
2 (c). it contains no original research.

(3). Broad in its coverage:
3 (a). it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and
3 (b). it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail

(4). Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.

(5). Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

(6). Illustrated, if possible, by images:
6 (a) images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and
6 (b). images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

• This is one of the best articles I have ever seen. Tremendous details on Levski. I have no issues with anything. I have been reading this article for the past 2 days. Some very minor issues may be present but not a barrier towards GA status. Most sources are in Bulgarian language. But we care only about accuracy, not the language. Even that's fine. My only issue is that the References are written in Cyrillic Script and Bulgarian language. Don't you think English translation of the titles should be done. Although not a GA criterion, but please check it if you intend to submit this article at WP:FAC.

This article satisfies Good article criteria. I'll gradly promote it. Wikipedia is in dire need of such well written biographies. Hope to see this article at WP:FAC soon. Thanks, Kensplanet^Talk_{Contributions} 11:03, 21 November 2008 (UTC)