Talk:Valentina Cuppi
Latest comment: 1 year ago by 95.232.89.246 in topic I'm not sure what the purpouse of the photograph is
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
I'm not sure what the purpouse of the photograph is
editIdeally, you'd think that to be encyclopedic it would either portrait the subject in a historical setting or defining moment, or just make her damn face recognizable.
What's the point of a portrait in which you can only see the hair, really? 95.232.89.246 (talk) 16:37, 28 February 2023 (UTC)