Talk:Usage share of BitTorrent clients
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Usage share of BitTorrent clients article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sources currently not used in article edit
2009 edit
- http://torrentfreak.com/thunder-blasts-utorrents-market-share-away-091204/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.27.104.129 (talk) 03:39, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
- http://torrentfreak.com/limewire-gets-more-serious-about-bittorrent-090704/
http://torrentfreak.com/whats-the-best-bittorrent-client-090517/- http://www.ethiopianreview.com/articles/14562
2008 edit
- --Otterathome (talk) 12:24, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
TorrentFreak user survey Removal edit
Does anyone else feel that this has no place here? The results our obviously skewed and incorrect due to Vuse posting it on their site. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zark424 (talk • contribs) 19:57, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Rerated article class edit
I rerated this article as a stub. There is not a single reference listed. A B-class article is full of sources and this has none. After updating the article it can be reconsidered for a higher class. § Music Sorter § (talk) 04:35, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Steam survay edit
Steam survayed users installed software and came up witht these stats:
µTorrent 29.41%,BitTorrent 5.28%,Vuze(Azureus) 4.37%,BitComet 2.44%
Does anyone think they are relevant? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.32.59.247 (talk) 22:42, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Nominate for merge edit
This article is hopelessly outdated, and hasn't seen any real activity in several years. I propose that it be merged with Comparison of BitTorrent clients, and have marked both pages to that effect. 65.158.81.126 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
Are there reliable sources for this kind of information? edit
I notice that several of the more popular bittorrent clients, according to this TorrentFreak list, don't have Wikipedia pages, so they aren't considered notable by Wikipedia. That seems to indicate a lack of reliable objective information about which clients are actually prevalent. Either that, or Wikipedia decisions on notability are not being made based on which clients are actually used. Normanmargolus (talk) 17:57, 12 November 2023 (UTC)