Talk:Ursa Major III
Latest comment: 6 months ago by C messier in topic Unreliable source
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Unreliable source
editBased on a preprint, which it may be never published. Preprints are not considered reliable sources. And a reliable source is needed when there is such a bold claim that a group of 60 stars that is 20 light years across is a galaxy and not a star cluster. --C messier (talk) 14:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- It has been published, and is now in The Astrophysical Journal and ADS. InTheAstronomy32 (talk) 23:32, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
- @InTheAstronomy32: Hm, it mentions that " its identity as a dwarf galaxy or star cluster is not clear at this time", contrary to what the wikipedia article suggests. C messier (talk) 08:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC)