Talk:Urokinase

Latest comment: 5 years ago by EMsmile in topic Not this absurd 'first' again!

Untitled edit

I moved the receptor to its own page

Not this absurd 'first' again! edit

Why do authors insist on writing this drivel? It was not 'first' discovered in 1947, it was discovered in 1947. It was discovered ONCE ONLY, not a first time and a second time (or whatever). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 15:01, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yep, the "first" has been deleted now. EMsmile (talk) 14:26, 1 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Edit links not placed correctly edit

I know this is a minor issue, but I noticed the edit boxes are appearing in the wrong place on this page - could it be something to do with the infoboxes' code? I note the first two boxes appear after the first infobox, at least for my browser (Firefox 2.0.0.17) and resolution (1440x900) --Rogerb67 (talk) 14:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

sources edit

Are there any sources for section 3 about the relationship with cancer? 89.31.50.92 (talk) 20:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Result: No merge. -- P 1 9 9   16:55, 12 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

This seems to be the same as PLAU (plasminogen activator, urokinase). I'm not sure how to merge this without messing up all the infoboxes. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 10:26, 31 January 2010 (UTC) I agree with this merge proposal, but am also unsure of the best way in which to do this without messing it up. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nexxen (talkcontribs) 04:37, 30 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

In my opinion, it would be wrong to merge these articles, Urokinase and PLAU. This article outlines a class of enzymes (EC 3.4.21.73), while the article PLAU has a focus on a specific human gene product, PLAU, from that class. --Dcirovic (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Eureka? edit

So when was it discovered? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 13:09, 15 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Link to gene edit

I agree that the two pages should be merged, but if not at least a link to PLAU is in order. Gon-no-suke (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Industrial production edit

Could someone please add information how it is nowadays produced industrially? It says that it was produced from urine - is this still the main way of producing this? If so, who collects the urine and where?