Untitled

edit

My Dear Friends, How can Mariam Akhtar Mir be born on 4th February,1973 when my friend who was in her class in King George High School,Dadar,Mumbai was born in 1968 and she also passed out from school in 1984 (Her 10th Standard Class,S.S.C.).My friend is of June,1968 and she should also be of 1968. Now she should be exactly 37 years old. She is bluffing that she is of 1973 birth.

From, goodsfriends@indiatimes.com

Please read WP:V. --Gurubrahma 09:58, 6 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

actually do I agree with "goodfriends" even though I dont know which year she was born. Jugal Hansraj who you can see that is quite younger than urmila in massom is born in 1972, it means that she must be older than him, thus born before 1973/4. Dhirad 15:39, 2 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Peer review

edit

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, ShahidTalk2me 04:08, 26 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

File:Urmilamatondkar.jpg Nominated for Deletion

edit
  An image used in this article, File:Urmilamatondkar.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Urmilamatondkar.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:04, 28 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Urmila Matondkar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Mariam Akhtar Mir. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Urmila Matondkar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 26 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2019

edit
171.61.120.246 (talk) 14:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

This is a misleading and factually wrong account. Her official name is "Mariam Akhtar Mir". Please make this correction.

  Not done: We don't immediately move pages just because someone officially changes their name, we usually wait for reliable sources to start using the name that way. See WP:OFFICIAL. – Þjarkur (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
Need sources for such claims. Even if the name change is official, the article shouldn't be moved as per WP:COMMONNAME. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 31 March 2019

edit
Vikas.kumar5885 (talk) 14:19, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply
  Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Þjarkur (talk) 15:15, 31 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Semi-protected edit request on 1 April 2019

edit

Her new name is "Mariam Akhtar Mir" 116.75.21.11 (talk) 22:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Not done: See above threads (WP:OFFICIAL), we can mention that she has chosen this new name, just need to add reliable sources for it. – Þjarkur (talk) 22:39, 1 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Wrong name

edit

Her real name is Mariyam Akhtar Mir after marriege muslim person.please correct her name. Thank you. Skusha3065 (talk) 10:10, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

One or more source(s) must be provided so that it can be changed. Tolly4bolly 12:38, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

objection on name

edit

name of the said actress has been changed .

she was rechristened 'Mariyam Akhtar Mir', who was married to a Kashmiri businessman and model Mohsin Akhtar Mir in 2015.

Point No. 8 in her changed profile proclaimed: "After her 'nikaah' (Muslim marriage ceremony before a cleric), she has changed her name legally' to Mariyam Akhtar Mir". so I object her using hindu name . Markiv nes (talk) 08:52, 18 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply