This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Talk:Uralian orogeny is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Since the name Uralian orogeny is used for a Neoproterozoic orogeny, I wonder if the name is right. I don't believe there would be two orogenies with the same name. Woodwalker (talk) 08:46, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Wasn't previously aware of the earlier event. Was it the Timanide Orogen? To avoid confusion perhaps this article content should be merged to Uralian orogenic belt (a stub I just discovered) and this article could be about the Neoprot. event. Vsmith (talk) 15:44, 25 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
Uralian orogenic belt seems to use a geologic name for a topographic feature. I find that puzzling, but who knows people in Russia follow outcrops (rather than mountain chains) to define the boundary between the continents? The Uralian phase (as I've seen it used) was at about 1,4-1,0 Ga, Timanide was in the range 700-500 Ma and is thought to be the lateral continuation of Cadomian (Europe) and Amazonian (South America). It's possible the Permian phase of the Ural mountains (collision between Laurussia and Siberia) is also called Uralian, I'll try to find out. Woodwalker (talk) 18:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
