Talk:Up All Night (One Direction album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen (public) (talk · contribs) 08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

I'll review. Thine Antique Pen (public) 08:26, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

References

• Ref 116 needs the dashes removed from it to be consistent with the other references. Also, change the "Direction, One" to "One Direction".
• Ref 117 needs the dashes removed from it to be consistent with the other references.

Both done, I have removed One Direction from author don't know how it go there AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation links

Per toolserver.

• Another World
• Payne
• Styles
• Stand Up
• I Wish
• Taken
• Na Na Na
• More than This
• More Than This

Done, some IP came and linked to everything for a reason- delinked and disambiguated for More Than This. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Dead external links

• [1]
• [2]
• [3]
• [4]

Have replaced all dead refs with new ones. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:29, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

• TAP, do you mind if I become a guest reviewer? TheSpecialUser ^TSU 15:47, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Once I'm done, you can. I'll drop you a line when I am. Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:51, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Lead

Looks good, no issues. All content in the lead is contained in the article. Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Background

"to an £2 million" -> "to a £2 million" Thine Antique Pen (public) 15:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Just to note, I won't be able to correct queries until Friday 17 August 2012. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 23:34, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Commercial performance

Random short sentence at the end, please include somewhere else. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

• Done added to top of section. AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Everything else

Everything else looks good, and seems to be of GA quality. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 20:42, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Good work! Passed. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 08:21, 26 August 2012 (UTC)