Talk:University of Mysore
 | This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 20:10, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Proper sections edit
I spent an hour or so dividing the article into respective sections. Although the article was very well written, it lacked proper sub-divisions.
It would be great if someone did the courses section properly. Prathik Rajendran M (talk) 08:36, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
Copy-Editing Flag edit
This article was included in a copy-editing request category and so I've given it some attention for my first official edit. This mostly consisted of correcting/reordering some English grammar to make better sense to an English speaker, but I've also added sources regarding the establishment of ISiM and TSRRC from academic texts and the University of Mysore website. Unfortunately, I was unable to find any proper citation for the Ford Foundation grant (their grants database is available here. I'm quite sure that the grant exists, otherwise the University wouldn't advertise it, but I couldn't find a verifiable source. Will aim to continue improving the article this week, and would welcome some input from someone familiar with the University, as the website information is sometimes contradictory or incomplete. Statera (talk) 04:12, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
More Research Needed edit
For the most part, this article seems to be pretty solidly written. However, it does seem to need more information on the University itself; for example, it mentions there being "four constituent colleges", but only names/describes one of them. The History section and opening section could also use some editing for clarity. The opening section seems a little large and disorganized for the content, and the History section appears to reference information ( some "Act", for instance) that is not actually in the rest of the article. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:21, 23 February 2015 (UTC)