Talk:University Transition Program

Vancouver Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Vancouver, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada and the surrounding metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VancouverWikipedia:WikiProject VancouverTemplate:WikiProject VancouverVancouver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: British Columbia / Education Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Education in Canada.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original research and/or unverified claims

Latest comment: 9 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

None of the information on the page, particularly the sections for courses, global citizenship program, and criticism, are verified. The tone of the article suggests that most of the information provided consists of original research. - Adevish (talk) 22:26, 17 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Most of the information is, surprisingly good about the program. There has to be a neutral point of view, so are there any criticisms? TheStarter (talk) 09:28, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Read the first paragraph in the article. Doesn't it sound more than a little bit fishy? I mean, "brainwash"? I'm a member of the UBC Transitions Program. It's a great program. You go ahead 2 years. How in the world is that bad? PS: I'm WHITE. Asian-Canadian is a horrible misconception. Doombot257 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 04:24, 14 October 2009 (UTC).Reply

I added some sources (both primary AND secondary) for the information in the article; I'd consider it verified. Re@waken ^talk 23:01, 16 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Classify?

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I know this is listed as a C - class, but this looks more of a Start-class. No research, no significant changes, no neutral point of view, other thoughts? TheStarter (talk) 09:41, 25 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

http://www.vsb.bc.ca/vsbprograms/kto12/TransitionProgramReunion.htm http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Examining+the+evolution+of+the+transition+program:+preparing...-a0113337793 http://www.canada.com/theprovince/news/story.html?id=23aed870-709b-4245-930e-9bcc43d99d2b

Knock yourselves out. Oh, yes, all the positive stuff is unverifiable original research, but so would any criticisms. 142.103.92.84 (talk) 14:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)stufszReply

Major reconstruction of links required

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The Transitions site has recently moved but I'm not sure how the page ended up so messy. It requires some attention. The new site is [1]. 75.156.69.71 (talk) 05:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:University Transition Program/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Should probably be lowered to a Start-class. It's not well researched, it stays fairly consistant, nothing changes, and it does not have a neutral point of view.

Last edited at 09:39, 25 March 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:28, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Add topic