Talk:Universal Time-Sharing System

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Peter Flass in topic Split CP-6 material

CP-6

edit

It seems like the time has come to split CP-6 into a separate article. The size of the CP-6 material overwhelms the remainder. It should be fairly simple. Peter Flass (talk) 14:29, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

PL-6

edit

PL-6 seems like a fairly interesting language. Bitsavers has a couple of manuals, which may be all there are. It's too bad the source or source listings aren't available. Peter Flass (talk) 14:31, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Split CP-6 material

edit

As I suggested above the CP-6 material overwhelmed the Xerox stuff in this article, so I moved it to Honeywell CP-6, leaving only a couple of paragraphs here. Otherwise, so far, the CP-6 article is basically all the text from here with a new lead and minor reformatting, since the original was so detailed. Please add CP-6 material there. Peter Flass (talk) 13:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)Reply