Talk:Universal Robots

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Universal Robots. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140302135431/http://www.universal-robots.com:80/GB/Universal_Robots/News.aspx?Action=1&NewsId=491&PID=14345 to http://www.universal-robots.com/GB/Universal_Robots/News.aspx?Action=1&NewsId=491&PID=14345
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150325042648/http://www.universal-robots.com:80/en/ to http://www.universal-robots.com/en/
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20150325042648/http://www.universal-robots.com:80/en/ to http://www.universal-robots.com/en

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Robotics1 (talk) 11:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)== Reads like an ad, so do the refs == ref 2 is 404 ref 3 is just another ad, so this article is an ad linking to another ad

ref 4 is a press release. How can you use a press release as a reference?

ref 5 is a link to their own site as captured by the wayback machine last year. ref 7 is a non existent server ref 8 is a press release and so on. The press releases were written by UR as was this entire article.

Only ref 21 is good. Robotics1 21:29, 23 July 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotics1 (talk • contribs)

This whole section is one big advert. Take "Universal Robots was the first company to launch a collaborative robot that could safely operate alongside employees, eliminating the need for safety cages or fencing" yeah? That is an untruth. Did you know the collision force if it hits you is 1460N - that would put someone seriously in hospital. Don't believe me? Check https://www.youtube.com/embed/g-MsVHFfNGc. If I add that to the article how long do you think it will stay there? (compare to ST Robotics R12 at just 60N https://strobotics.com/cobot.htm)