Talk:Universal Character Set feature

Proposed deletion - move text to IBM 1403 and make this a redirect?

edit

@Fram:, @Chatul: - the feature may not be (and probably isn't) notable enough for a standalone article, but it might be interesting enough to discuss in the article about the printer for which that's a feature.

Perhaps the right thing to do is move this discussion of that feature to IBM 1403 and make this a redirect to the section containing that discussion. Guy Harris (talk) 21:01, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

UCS was a feature for a bunch of printers, not just the 1403. If the material is to be moved to the 1403 article then it should be replicated for, e.g., 3211. Perhaps a better home would be IBM hammer printers. --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 22:19, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
OK, and then expand it to mention the other printers with the feature, with references if available. Guy Harris (talk) 23:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
I believe that every printer currently[a] mentioned in IBM hammer printers supported UCS except the 1403 Model 1 and the 3270 printers.[b] --Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz Username:Chatul (talk) 15:38, 25 November 2022 (UTC) --Revised 18:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decided to boldly merge it into IBM hammer printers since the discussion above seems to have stalled and I thought it would be a bummer if this short albeit interesting tidbit of history got removed. Feel free to whack me if I missed any details. DigitalIceAge (talk) 19:01, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notes

  1. ^ the 370, 407, 716, 717, 720, 730 and 7400 do not support UCS.
  2. ^ The 3270 printers, e.g.,
    • 3284
    • 3286
    • 3287
    • 3288
    • 4224
    did not support UCS, however, some of them supported Programmed Symbol Sets (PSS), a similar facility with a very different interface.