This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I would like to question the categorization of Hammer as a Tenth Amendment case. I read Hammer as falling primarily into a group of cases that sought to apply distinctions from dormant commerce clause jurisprudence into exercise of the commerce clause power by Congress. It seems to me that the opinion devotes a single line to the Tenth Amendment, and virtually the rest of the opinion to making distinctions between regulating the transport of goods across state lines, on the one hand, and regulating the manufacturing process.
