Talk:United States European Command

soviet union?

the former Soviet Union, except the five central Asian republics

What are these five? --Abdull 16:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:GenGruenther NATO.jpg

The image File:GenGruenther NATO.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

• File:Andrew Goodpaster NATO photo.jpg
• File:Lauris Norstad NATO photo.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --21:54, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Relocation of EUCOM from France to Germany in 1967

The current version of the Article states: "In 1966, disagreements within NATO over involvement in the Vietnam War prompted France to demand the removal of all US and NATO headquarters and forces from French soil.[citation needed". I was unable to find any authority or support for the proposition that it was a disagreement concerning Vietnam that led to the French demand the US (and NATO) depart.

Rather, this NATO Allied Command Operations site <http://www.aco.nato.int/page1463252.aspx> supports the position that the French were unhappy about what they perceived to be their inability to more greatly influence NATO military policy, and wanted to increase their global influence and status, and says, "In February 1966 President de Gaulle stated that the changed world situation "stripped of justification” NATO's military integration and that France was therefore re-establishing her sovereignty over French territory. As a result, all forces within France's borders would have to come under French control by April 1969. Soon afterward, France announced that it was withdrawing from the headquarters of Allied Command Europe and that SHAPE and its subordinate headquarters Allied Forces Central Europe (AFCENT) must leave French territory by April 1967."

It looks as though the demand that "all forces within France's borders would have to come under French control" coupled with the demand that SHAPE headquarters and subordinate headquarters leave France by April 1967 were the impetus for the decision by USEUCOM to move from France to Stuttgart.

Unless someone can either provide support for the statement that this was a disagreement about Vietnam, or show some reason to believe that the move was not based on France wanting to increase its global influence and status by being more independent militarily, I would propose to edit the edit the sentence as it now appears to read somewhat as follows: "In 1966, following disagreements by the French with certain NATO military policies, President de Gaulle stated that all forces within France's borders would have to come under French control by April 1969. Soon afterward, France announced that SHAPE and its subordinate headquarters must leave French territory by April 1967." Citation would be to the ACO webpage mentioned above.

Comments? D.A.Timm (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Seeing none, I made the change. D.A.Timm (talk) 09:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States European Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.10thaamdc.army.mil/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141213004959/http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/security/01/08/open-only-in-case-of-an-emergenc.html to http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/security/01/08/open-only-in-case-of-an-emergenc.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:09, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United States European Command. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140530144716/http://www.eur.army.mil/173abct/ to http://www.eur.army.mil/173abct/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081009235542/http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Politics/InternationalStudies/InternationalSecurityStrategicSt/?view=usa&ci=9780198291329 to http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Politics/InternationalStudies/InternationalSecurityStrategicSt/?view=usa&ci=9780198291329

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

United States Forces Azores

I note that although the History section includes a short discussion of the Iceland Defense Force, its accession to EUCOM in 2002 and its termination in 2006, similar treatment is not accorded United States Forces Azores. I no longer have access to the detailed history of that subordinate Unified Command of USEUCOM, but perhaps someone who does would be willing to add a sentence or two.

I also note that the page for United States Forces Azores could use updating. D.A.Timm (talk) 14:27, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

Mistake in Euler diagram?

I believe there is a mistake in the Euler diagram of European alliances (Section 1: history and operations). Denmark seems to be corrently placed within the EU but incorectly outside NATO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.62.117.215 (talk) 10:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)