Talk:United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri/GA1

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    Pass GA.

I encourage you to improve this article. As of now, it is just barely a GA or not a GA. Some things to consider are:

notable cases. This is the authors' opinion or original research. This is not to say the opinion is not valid.

There is not a good balance between explaining the federal court system in general and what is different about Missouri.

There's also conflicting information. SE division mentioned but also the S division.

TeacherA (talk) 01:10, 21 April 2009 (UTC)Reply