This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Page setup is garbled after table of former. I correct this by replacing
{{end U.S. judgeship Former}}
with the standard pipe-syntax table-end marker |}, which I admit is quick but dirty. Someone more knowledgeable than I on the {{start / {{end syntax may want to change this to avoid mixed syntax. Stefan Ivanovich 11:26, 1 November 2005 (UTC)Reply
I'm not sure what's going on. While {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} did redirect to {{end box}} and a certain user did move the {{end box}} template, that should not have affected the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template. I'm wondering if somebody attempted to upgrade the underlying MediaWiki software and broke something. In any case, I've got the {{end U.S. judgeship Former}} template working.
Also, I wrote the edit summary before I saw that you had posted on the discussion page. I think my edit summary was too harsh, particularly for someone who went to the trouble of posting on the talk page, so I apologize for that.
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The heading is now inaccurate. It says that this is the court as of the elevation of Alito to the Supreme Court. Judge Rosenn has since died, and his death has now been reflected in the table. So it's no longer a table of the court as of Alito's elevation but as of Rosenn's death. That should be changed, but I'm not sure exactly what it should say. Should the Alito reference stay in there? I imagine part of the purpose of that was to make it clear that this takes his elevation into account, and maybe there's still reason for mentioning that, but I wouldn't know how to say it to make it accurate about reflecting Judge Rosenn's death. — Parableman (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Judge Roth will take Senior Status on May 31, 2006. The info is here: [1]. Let's remember to update then.--Smashingworth 20:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
