Talk:United Nations Disengagement Observer Force

International relations: United Nations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations.

Military history: Middle East

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Middle Eastern military history task force

Syria Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WARNING: ACTIVE COMMUNITY SANCTIONS

The article United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, along with other pages relating to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL, is designated by the community as a contentious topic. The current restrictions are:

Limit of one revert in 24 hours: This article is under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24-hour period)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Remedy instructions and exemptions

Enforcement procedures:

Violations of any restrictions (excluding 1RR/reverting violations) and other conduct issues should be reported to the administrators' incidents noticeboard. Violations of revert restrictions should be reported to the administrators' edit warring noticeboard.
Editors who violate any listed restrictions may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.
An editor must be aware before they can be sanctioned.

With respect to any reverting restrictions:

Edits made solely to enforce any clearly established consensus are exempt from all edit-warring restrictions. In order to be considered "clearly established" the consensus must be proven by prior talk-page discussion.
Edits made which remove or otherwise change any material placed by clearly established consensus, without first obtaining consensus to do so, may be treated in the same manner as clear vandalism.
Clear vandalism of any origin may be reverted without restriction.
Reverts of edits made by anonymous (IP) editors that are not vandalism are exempt from the 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring. If you are in doubt, contact an administrator for assistance.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Graphics edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Graphics is needed for the article. A great map can be found on the official UN site. But I'm unsure of the copyright status. --Kvasir 06:24, 19 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Seperation barriers edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Anyone able to find the physical aspect of the seperation barriers? Details on checkpoints and fence to control entry would be great. Anything to demarcate the borders? --Kvasir 07:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Civilian population inside the zone? edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The article is very unclear on wheter there are syrian civilians living inside the zone. In addition to the deserted capital, some maps shows two additional villages. Were they evacuated too? Article says syrian police operates inside the zone. This giving an indication that syrian civilians are living there. But it would be very interesting to know how many syrians that lives inside the zone. 50? 1000? Or what? Are they all farmers or do they work for the UN?

Bjarnulf, Oslo —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.209.82.142 (talk) 23:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

It is already mentioned in the article that the buffer zone is "inhabited". Good point, however, as numbers would be helpful and the types of economy happening within the zone. --Kvasir (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Name edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

My dad told me that there's a term for people who live in the Buffer Zone, but he can't remember what it was. Is there a name for this area, perhaps? "Nuetralistan" or something? 97.96.65.108 (talk) 23:30, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Dates edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dates of October/Yom Kippur war is obviously wrong (by 3 years), so it might be worth to check all the other ones too.

As of 22/06/13, the Japanese and Croatian peacekeeping forces have fully withdrawn, while the Austrian Unit is in the process of pulling out. Article needs to be updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.137.217.177 (talk) 20:42, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United Nations Disengagement Observer Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic