Talk:United Nations Association of Australia (Queensland) Community Award
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Removal of Orphan Tag
editJust a brief note of thanks to Shiftchange for tidying up the article. I have added links, and I believe there should be more than the necessary number indicated in Section 4.4 of Wikipedia Orphan for the article to be de-orphaned. I'll wait a few days before doing this, though, to see if there is further discussion. Jamessmithpage (talk) 18:08, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Actually there is no change since the Orphan tag was added. If you click the What links here link from the article and then select article pages only, you will see there are no pages that link to United Nations Association of Australia (Queensland) Community Award except for 2 redirect pages which aren't counted. - 22:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. I've now included two ingoing links to the article. Jamessmithpage (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
- Further to the above, I believe there are now three ingoing links to the article. I will still wait a further few days before taking any further action, in order to allow for further comment. Jamessmithpage (talk) 02:09, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- You might want to add it to the List of prizes, medals, and awards. - Shiftchange (talk) 02:45, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, will have a look at that. Thanks again for your assistance with the article generally. Regards Jamessmithpage (talk) 05:50, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Reliable Sources
editHello PeskyCommoner and others, and thanks PC for your reading of the article and contribution. However I was wondering if you might provide some clarification. The article cites as sources the UNAA of Qld Brochure and the UNAA of Qld Newsletter. Now, as you would be aware, the UNAA Qld is an organization with the Governor of Queensland as Patron. Is it your contention that the above are not reliable sources? Jamessmithpage (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 12:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC).
- I didn't think the refimprove tag was appropriate as the article was so short and had 2 citations already. It probably should be removed. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:25, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. My thinking, however, is not to do anything for a few days more, to enable any others to enter into discussion on this issue, should they so desire. BTW, my reference to PeskyCommoner should in fact be to ThePeskyCommoner. Jamessmithpage (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- Just an update on this article. I've included two further references which are independent of the UNAAQ. I think that Shiftchange was correct (and BTW thanks Shiftchange for this) in applying the primary sources tag at the top of the article back in October of last year. I think this problem has been now addressed. What I propose to do is to delete the primary sources tag later in the week - however if you think this action may be problematic please don't hesitate to indicate here in this talk page. Jamessmithpage (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Postscript. I believe there will be a further independent reference available within the coming week. Therefore I will not take any action until that further independent reference becomes available. Jamessmithpage (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've just added the further independent reference alluded to above. This now means there are 2 UNAAQ references to the article, and 3 nonUNAAQ references. As there has been no comment to the contrary about removing the tag, I will do so now. Trust this is OK with everyone. Jamessmithpage (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- Postscript. I believe there will be a further independent reference available within the coming week. Therefore I will not take any action until that further independent reference becomes available. Jamessmithpage (talk) 23:52, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Just an update on this article. I've included two further references which are independent of the UNAAQ. I think that Shiftchange was correct (and BTW thanks Shiftchange for this) in applying the primary sources tag at the top of the article back in October of last year. I think this problem has been now addressed. What I propose to do is to delete the primary sources tag later in the week - however if you think this action may be problematic please don't hesitate to indicate here in this talk page. Jamessmithpage (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
- Agreed. My thinking, however, is not to do anything for a few days more, to enable any others to enter into discussion on this issue, should they so desire. BTW, my reference to PeskyCommoner should in fact be to ThePeskyCommoner. Jamessmithpage (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on United Nations Association of Australia (Queensland) Community Award. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.stylemagazines.com.au/filelib/emags/201209_BNE/emag.html - Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140904233717/http://www.margaretdewit.com.au/news.php?article=3673-Councillor-Margaret-de-Wit-presents-United-Nations-Awards to http://www.margaretdewit.com.au/news.php?article=3673-Councillor-Margaret-de-Wit-presents-United-Nations-Awards
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://quest.newspaperdirect.com/epaper/viewer.aspx, - Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120325205508/http://www.moretonbay.qld.gov.au/uploadedFiles/moretonbay/living/community/youth-links-newsletter/United-nations-community-awards.pdf to http://www.moretonbay.qld.gov.au/uploadedFiles/moretonbay/living/community/youth-links-newsletter/United-nations-community-awards.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 20 July 2016 (UTC)