Talk:United House of Prayer for All People

What to do and what not to do on this article

Do

• Be neutral (scrupulously so)
• Be verifiable.
• Be bold
• Be collaborative

Don't

• Don't be original.
• Don't edit war
• Don't soapbox.
• Don't randomly stick tags everywhere. {{sofixit}}, if you please.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.

This is not a forum for discussion.

The purpose of this talk page is to reach consensus about improvement of the article named United House of Prayer for All People. If you have questions, you may want to consult the official website of the church, a link can be found in the external links section of this article. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia that anyone can edit. It is not run or maintained by members of the United House of Prayer for All People. Ltwin (talk) 16:57, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Archiving

The issues these discussions deal with have been resolved so I think its time to archive.

Merger

I think there should be a merger with this to include, or at least a reference to, the shout band seeing as the music is such a memorable part providing that it stays completely unbiased and only informative on the basics of its relationship to the United House of Prayer. (Machpovii3...Holla Atcha Bezzle, Kid! 09:18, 25 December 2008 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Machpovii3 (talk • contribs)

Removed image that was not showing up

File:UhopAugusta.jpg

Inside "The Madison" (cafeteria) of United House of Prayer for All People, Augusta Motherhouse in Augusta, GA

This is the image that was not showing up. Ltwin (talk) 04:38, 11 April 2009 (UTC) =>=>=>=>

Multiple quality issues

This article is poorly written and structured and the sections about the church's leaders are hagiography not encyclopedia. Also, the lengthy paragraph about the current bishop is pure copy & paste and contains a list of unnecessary detail (that could be part of a biographical article but does not belong here). Albrecht Conz (talk) 15:24, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

I think I've improved the Bailey section. If someone wants to put any of that data back in, they need to produce references.Deb (talk) 17:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on United House of Prayer for All People. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081203235126/http://www.culturaltourismdc.org:80/info-url3948/info-url_show.htm?doc_id=215142&attrib_id=7973 to http://www.culturaltourismdc.org/info-url3948/info-url_show.htm?doc_id=215142&attrib_id=7973
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20071225203447/http://www.kennedy-center.org:80/programs/millennium/artist_detail.cfm?artist_id=SWTHVNKING to http://www.kennedy-center.org/programs/millennium/artist_detail.cfm?artist_id=SWTHVNKING

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:23, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

POV dispute

@Deb: I'm not sure if I understand this POV tag here. In what way is this article biased? Jarble (talk) 05:37, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Mmm. I can't remember exactly what attracted my attention to it, but the edit warring indicates disputes over the wording. I've removed the tag, since I can't justify it at the moment. Deb (talk) 08:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)