Talk:Union Stock Yards/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Ruslik0 in topic GA Reassessment

GA Reassessment edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

  This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are some issues that may need to be addressed, listed below. I will check back in seven days. If these issues are addressed, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far.

  1. The lead does not satisfy WP:LEAD:
  2. The 'In popular culture' section should be disbanded, while the information should be relocated to other sections.
    Is it O.K. just to reformat it as prose.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  3. I put one {{cn}} tag into the article. Please, provide a citation.
    Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 19:18, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
  4. Can, at least, some items in 'Bibliography' be cited in the text? It will improve the article from the point of view of verifiability.-Ruslik_Zero 09:02, 2 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
    I have cited the place where you placed the citation tag.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article is delisted. Ruslik_Zero 14:52, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Since you fixed everything, I will reconsider my decision. The article is kept. Ruslik_Zero 13:40, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply