 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=icon}
The article is written with a subjective bias, although the points may be factually correct it could be written more objectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.148.176.202 (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Site seems to be back online edit
But now it's at .co.uk rather than .com. Unsure whether it's made by the same people or unrelated. It's full of spammy listicles and things. 86.139.166.176 (talk) 17:01, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
- Yes the page does leave something to be desired, but it seems from a past edit summary that past tense for this makes sense. Deserves more attention, though. Biosthmors (talk) pls notify me (i.e. {{U}}) while signing a reply, thx 03:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
New scope edit
Most recent edits are referring to the current site and brand at unilad.co.uk, as opposed to the .com that is now defunct. I will be editing the rest of the article for consistency. 93 06:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
I have edited the page significantly, although the content and criticism sections still mainly refer to the old site. The new site appears as if it will soon be notable in itself, and is distinct enough that it could possibly be split into a new article some time in the future. 93 08:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Fake News edit
Should it be added that Unilad states the anti-Islamist muslim march in Cologne was attended by 10,000 people although it was only by about 2,500 (300 in the beginning)?--31.19.51.214 (talk) 12:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)